Europex supports EMIR Refit but calls for deletion of Amendment 4 in line with the overall intention to simplify and streamline

Brussels, 19 March 2018 |Europex strongly supports the EMIR Refit process and welcomes the ECON draft report as well as the intended simplification of reporting obligations and improvement of data quality. We especially value the aim to achieve a reduction of costs for market participants and to extend the possibilities of choice for clearing members. However, we are highly concerned about Amendment 4 as tabled on 26 January 2018 in the Langen draft report. We fear that the amendment, which states that: ‘The CCP should report to the TR specified by the counterparty. Clearing members and their clients should be
Read More

Categories: Position Papers.

The need to simplify and streamline reporting obligations under EMIR, MiFID II/MiFIR and REMIT – Europex response to Commission fitness check on supervisory reporting

Brussels, 14 March 2018 | Europex welcomes the opportunity to take part in the “fitness check on supervisory reporting” of the European Commission and to discuss the effectiveness and efficiency of existing EU-level supervisory reporting requirements. We deeply believe in the simplification and streamlining of regulatory reporting. Electricity and gas derivative contracts are covered by reporting obligations stemming from four pieces of legislation: namely EMIR, MiFID II/MiFIR, REMIT and MAR. This constitutes a heavy reporting burden for energy exchanges and clearing houses as well as for market participants. Consequently, there is a need to streamline the requirements in order to
Read More

Categories: Consultation Responses.

Updating and improving EMIR – Europex comments on Commission’s EMIR amendment proposal

Brussels, 13 October 2017 | Europex welcomes the European Commission’s recently tabled EMIR amendment proposal that is currently being discussed by the European Parliament and the Council. We strongly support its aim to simplify reporting obligations and improve data quality. We believe that the proposal takes the right approach by reducing the burden on Non- Financial Counterparties (NFCs) and smaller Financial Counterparties (FCs). We explicitly share the goal to increase transparency with respect to clearing and reporting. In the following, we would like to comment on four key aspects of the Commission’s proposal: 1. Single-sided reporting by Central Counter Parties (CCPs)
Read More

Categories: Position Papers.